您好,欢迎访问一九零五行业门户网

python常用web框架简单性能测试结果分享(包含django、flask、bottle、tornado)

测了一下django、flask、bottle、tornado 框架本身最简单的性能。对django的性能完全无语了。
django、flask、bottle 均使用gunicorn+gevent启动,单进程,并且关闭debug,请求均只返回一个字符串ok。
tornado直接自己启动,其他内容一致。
测试软件为 siege,测试os为cenos6 64位,测试命令为:
复制代码 代码如下:
siege -c 100 -r 100 -b http://127.0.0.1:5000/
django测试结果为:
复制代码 代码如下:
transactions:               10000 hits
availability:              100.00 %
elapsed time:               18.51 secs
data transferred:            0.02 mb
response time:                0.18 secs
transaction rate:          540.25 trans/sec
throughput:                0.00 mb/sec
concurrency:               99.35
successful transactions:       10000
failed transactions:               0
longest transaction:            0.30
shortest transaction:            0.12
django(去掉所有middleware)测试结果为:
复制代码 代码如下:
transactions:               10000 hits
availability:              100.00 %
elapsed time:               12.97 secs
data transferred:            0.02 mb
response time:                0.13 secs
transaction rate:          771.01 trans/sec
throughput:                0.00 mb/sec
concurrency:               99.41
successful transactions:       10000
failed transactions:               0
longest transaction:            0.28
shortest transaction:            0.12
flask测试结果为:
复制代码 代码如下:
transactions:               10000 hits
availability:              100.00 %
elapsed time:                5.47 secs
data transferred:            0.02 mb
response time:                0.05 secs
transaction rate:         1828.15 trans/sec
throughput:                0.00 mb/sec
concurrency:               96.25
successful transactions:       10000
failed transactions:               0
longest transaction:            0.11
shortest transaction:            0.00
bottle测试结果为:
复制代码 代码如下:
transactions:               10000 hits
availability:              100.00 %
elapsed time:                4.55 secs
data transferred:            0.02 mb
response time:                0.04 secs
transaction rate:         2197.80 trans/sec
throughput:                0.00 mb/sec
concurrency:               96.81
successful transactions:       10000
failed transactions:               0
longest transaction:            0.09
shortest transaction:            0.00
tornado测试结果为:
复制代码 代码如下:
transactions:               10000 hits
availability:              100.00 %
elapsed time:                7.06 secs
data transferred:            0.02 mb
response time:                0.07 secs
transaction rate:         1416.43 trans/sec
throughput:                0.00 mb/sec
concurrency:               99.51
successful transactions:       10000
failed transactions:               0
longest transaction:            0.09
shortest transaction:            0.01
可见纯框架自身的性能为:
复制代码 代码如下:
bottle > flask > tornado > django
结合实际使用:tornado 使用了异步驱动,所以在写业务代码时如果稍有同步耗时性能就会急剧下降;
bottle需要自己实现的东西太多,加上之后不知道性能会怎样;
flask性能稍微差点,但周边的支持已经很丰富了;
django就不说了,性能已经没法看了,唯一的好处就是开发的架子都已经搭好,开发速度快很多
因为最近正在为一个项目选型发愁,所以就测了一下,记录在此吧。
ps: 2014-6-23 使用 centos6 64位 重新进行了测试,得出与生产环境更匹配的结果,并修改了文章。
其它类似信息

推荐信息